|
Clinical evaluation outcomes from the Disability of arm shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire, SF-36 eight domain scores, ULTT3 (number of positive tests) pain threshold scores (values in brackets are normalized to third nail bed; D3), grip and pinch-grip strength for the at-risk, NSAP and LE groups. |
||||||
| At-risk |
NSAP |
LE |
||||
|
|
||||||
| n |
Mean ± SD |
n |
Mean ± SD |
n |
Mean ± SD |
|
|
|
||||||
| DASH |
||||||
| Disability score |
8 |
0.66 ± 1.29* |
16 |
23.83 ± 12.96** |
11 |
32.39 ± 15.10** |
| Work module |
8 |
0.00 ± 0.00* |
15 |
35.22 ± 31.59** |
11 |
28.98 ± 26.56 |
| Sport/art module |
4 |
0.00 ± 0.00* |
9 |
68.06 ± 29.22** |
7 |
56.3 ± 27.2** |
| SF-36 |
||||||
| Physical functioning |
8 |
97.50 ± 3.78* |
15 |
82.00 ± 18.01** |
11 |
75.45 ± 17.39** |
| Role physical |
8 |
100.00 ± 0.0* |
16 |
62.50 ± 38.76** |
11 |
50.00 ± 41.83** |
| Bodily pain |
8 |
88.50 ± 10.35* |
16 |
57.38 ± 18.75** |
11 |
47.36 ± 21.72** |
| General health |
8 |
84.88 ± 5.51 |
16 |
73.12 ± 20.04 |
11 |
68.27 ± 20.65 |
| Vitality |
8 |
73.75 ± 11.88* |
16 |
61.56 ± 18.86 |
11 |
53.18 ± 19.01** |
| Social functioning |
8 |
98.44 ± 4.42 |
16 |
84.38 ± 17.38 |
11 |
77.27 ± 31.03 |
| Emotional role |
8 |
83.33 ± 30.86 |
16 |
83.33 ± 32.20 |
11 |
81.82 ± 27.34 |
| Mental health |
8 |
88.00 ± 9.32 |
16 |
76.50 ± 16.58 |
11 |
73.09 ± 16.88 |
| ULLT3 (n positive) |
8 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
11 |
5 |
| Pain Threshold (kg/cm2) |
||||||
| D3 |
8 |
10.38 ± 5.87 |
16 |
12.87 ± 5.95 |
11 |
15.03 ± 6.23 |
| ECRB |
8 |
8.03 ± 4.82 (77%)* |
16 |
5.78 ± 3.49 (45%)** |
11 |
7.34 ± 4.16 (49%) |
| FCR |
8 |
10.74 ± 6.73 (103%) |
16 |
9.18 ± 5.06 (71%) |
11 |
9.72 ± 4.86 (65%) |
| BB |
8 |
8.48 ± 3.59 (82%) |
16 |
9.08 ± 4.74 (71%) |
11 |
10.65 ± 6.24 (71%) |
| TB |
8 |
9.34 ± 4.72 (90%)* |
16 |
8.28 ± 5.02 (64%)** |
11 |
12.58 ± 6.72 (84%) |
| Grip strength (kg) |
8 |
31.75 ± 5.56 |
16 |
33.95 ± 13.06 |
11 |
33.02 ± 12.53 |
| Pinch-grip strength (kg) |
8 |
7.39 ± 7.62 |
16 |
9.41 ± 3.89 |
11 |
11.14 ± 4.28 |
|
Parameters marked with * are significantly different from the other groups parameters marked with ** (p < 0.05) | ||||||
Calder et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2008 5:34 doi:10.1186/1743-0003-5-34 |
||||||