Table 2 |
|||||
|
Clinical evaluation of the therapy. |
|||||
|
Subject |
No. of sessions |
FMA pre |
FMA post |
ΔFMA |
Ash |
|
|
|||||
|
S1 |
11 |
4 |
8 |
4 |
3 |
|
S2 |
12 |
13 |
16 |
3 |
2 |
|
S3 |
10 |
25 |
31 |
6 |
1+ |
|
S4 |
12 |
36 |
38 |
2 |
1 |
|
S5 |
10 |
9 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
|
S6 |
10 |
22 |
23 |
1 |
3 |
|
S7 |
8 |
27 |
34 |
7 |
1+ |
|
S8 |
9 |
43 |
46 |
3 |
1 |
|
S9 |
6 |
44 |
48 |
4 |
1 |
|
S10 |
6 |
11 |
13 |
2 |
1+ |
|
|
|||||
|
Mean ± SD |
23.4 ± 14.26 |
26.8 ± 14.6 |
3.4 ± 1.89 |
||
|
|
|||||
|
FMA: Fugl-Meyer Arm section score (0-66), before (pre) and after (post) the robot therapy sessions. Ash: Ashworth score (0-4) before robot therapy (it did not change during therapy). |
|||||
|
Vergaro et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2010 7:13 doi:10.1186/1743-0003-7-13 |
|||||